The judge rejects a sexual battery lawsuit

SEAN “Diddi” Combs keeps the victory in court.

Two months after being mainly cleaned In a criminal trial in Blockbuster, Hip-Hop Mogul won Tuesday, Tuesday, discarding civil lawsuit by accusing him of drugs and sexual gathering of the 23-year-old man in after 2015. years.

He said the judge in Manhattan said that in February was submitted to the statute of restrictions expired in any state, which could be applied, “because the action is untimely and under New York and California, … must be fired in relation to all the accused.”

Tony Buzbeea lawyer representing the Unnamed Prosecutor John Doe, he said Bilbord It was a judgment on Wednesday, “I wouldn’t call it to win Mr. Combs,” Buzbee said. “We will not allow Mr. Combs to avoid trial at the merits due to the technical technique.”

The verdict is the second great legal victory for Diddi in the right of his criminal judgment. Earlier this month, Federal Judge He rejected a 60 million dollar litigation submit Making a band 2 Competition Sarak Sara – a verdict that said that the case was submitted too late too late.

These civic cases are only two-tenths filed against combes in the last two years, in addition to their Blockbuster Federal Criminal Case. Even after they beat them, many others remain in front of other judges.

Combs was largely relieved last month in a criminal case, who accused him of forcing the girl to participate in drug-off sex mars called “Freak-off”. The jurors found him not guilty of racketing (RICO) and accusations of trafficking in sex, although they condemned him to two points of interstate prostitution. He is currently in prison, waiting for punishment in October in October who could see him in prison for several years.

The case was rejected on Tuesday the accused gases of drugs and attacking John Doe – “Music Contractor who takes career as a rapper and singing” – in 2015 year at Los Angelesa KC 20/20 club. The victim said that he applauded “in and from consciousness” after he drank the pointed drink, and then he woke up that he was coming to the comb and believed that the star “performed oral sex on it.”

But in the verdict, he rejects the case, the judge said that it had only five years old to submit his case. Although in 2019, a law was passed to expand the statute of limitations up to 20 years, the judge said that the law does not apply retroactively.

“While the plaintiff claims that (newer law) refers and gives him a 20-year-old period to submit this action, this argument fails:” The judge wrote. “The request for the prosecutor, submitted in 2025. years, remains untimely under the New York law.”

Akusur was stated in California, as an alternative, claiming that the so-called state window of the state for sex claims on sexual attacks allowed him to sue. But the judge also rejected that argument: “The court concludes that the request is untimely under California.”

In the statement Bilbord On Wednesday, Buzbee said that the verdict “just another step in the process” and promised to make it further to participate anti-combing claims.

“Retroactive ability or statute in question was an open question. The court in New York answered that question,” Buzbee said. “As with many cases like this, we will be in California in which the alleged attack took place.”