Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Warner Bros. Discovery filed a lawsuit for a copyright violation against Ai Picture and Video company Midjourneidoing it to the third major entertainment company to make it accompanying Disney and Universal Similar lawsuit submitted earlier this year.
The lawsuit claims that the company and violated copyright protection enabling and users to create pictures with characters such as Batman, Scoobi doo and Bugs Bunny.
“Midjourney thinks it’s above the law,” said Warner Bros. Discoveri said in the appeal. “Midjourney also calculated a decision on profiting zero Protection for copyright owners Although Midgourne knows about the scope of their pirate and copyright violation. ”
Midjourney is one of the most popular AI Painting GeneratorsAllowing everyone to create AI pictures and videos with simple text instructions. The lawsuit covers Warner Bros. Entertainment and her affiliates, including DC comics, cartoon networks and products of Hanna-Barber.
The image included in the lawsuit that submits the prominence of Midjourney’s ability to create images.
In the lawsuit, Warner Bros. The discovery notes that Midjourney recently fell Video generation model As proof that AI firm knew that copyright was breach. In the first few days of release video models, the lawsuit states, Midjourney stopped users with animating scenes with characters. The limitations eventually raised, but the fun giant it shows it as Midjourney’s knowledge of injustice. Detection of Warner Bros. It also states that AI company is updated in accordance with services to ban redeaming, use of technological safety companies.
Requests for copyright violations are not new for Midjournei. In June, Disney and Universal sued And the program, calling it “a pit without the bottom of the plagiarism” and “textbook violations of copyright” in his submission. Warner Bros. Discoveri represent the same law firm that submitted a suit on behalf of Disney and universal.
Do not miss any of our impartial technological content and laboratory criticism. Add the CNet as a preferred Google Source.
Warner Bros. The detection spokesman said, “The heart of what we do is entering our audience, and filed this suit to protect our facilities, and submitted this suit to protect our contents, and we submitted this suit to protect our contents and our suits. ” The statements from Disney and Nbcuniversal veils expressed similar feelings. Midjourney did not immediately respond to a comment request.
This lawsuit is further proof that the copyright is one of the most Disputable legal issues In the age of ai. Concerns exist at each stage of creating content AI, including copyrighted materials used for training and models and whether these models can create content that meets the legal definition of violation of the law.
There are also cases in progress between publishers, creators and and companies. AI-AI-AI-AI Anthropic and Target He recently scored two victories, with courts who claim that the training of their models on the author’s books represent fair use. But there are still a lot of questions and legal uncertainty.
(Discovered by: Ziff Davis, Cneta Registry Company, in April, filed a lawsuit against Openai, stating that Ziff Davis Copyright in training and managed his AI and systems.)
This is just a pending step. Midjourne users should not expect legal battles to be expected to volume it is served for a service.
