European Court Rules in favor of the latest American and EU data transfer frameworks

The second highest court in Europe has rejected the challenge against Between the European Union and the US. “On the date of adoption of the controversial decision, the United States has provided an adequate level of personal data transferred from the European Union to organizations in that country,” the general court of the EU was ruled ().

The two sides mediated the indebted framework of data privacy in 2023. To continue to enable American companies to store personal information on European users on state servers. The Pact included a provision that allows Europeans to file complaints against what American companies work with their data.

The French Politician Philippe Latembe sued the EU and the EU’s executive, which hit the agreement with the US, claiming that “there were inadequate guarantees in terms of private and family life due to widespread and widespread and bulk collection of personal data.” . He also said that the Data Protection Court (DPRC), He was not an independent tribunal and did not necessarily offer a level of protection necessary in the European law.

The General Court found that the functioning of DPRC and the appointment of judges “followed by several protective measures and conditions to ensure the independence of its members.” They stated that only lawyer can remove the judges and cause, while the AG and intelligence agencies “may not interfere or improperly affect their work.”

Political landscape dramatically moved since the agreement was reached in 2023. years. The Trump Administration has Through independent government agencies and there were in focissions with the EU on issues regulated by the main American technical companies and international trade. However, the General Court points out that the EC needs to be careful for the application of the legal framework.

“If the legal framework is in force in the United States at the time of adopting disputed decisions, the Commission, if necessary, suspend, amend or abolish a disputed decision or to limit its scope,” the court said. The judges also rejected the Latomes allegations regarding the expensive collection of personal data.

Kalome can still take the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The above court in Europe previously abolished two previous data transmission offers between the EU and the US – The and the – The following challenges of the Activist Privacy Program Max Schrem, which raised concerns about American intelligence agencies approaching the private data of European citizens.