Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Our smoke detection test allows us to test how fast each model raises the alarm when the smoke enters the environment.
When it comes to discovering smoke, it is essential. So we designed a test that simulates basically in real life.
The first thing you need to know is that there are two main types of fires that these products are designed for: Fire disadvantage and fire.
Fire (or slow ignition) refers to combustion that occurs on the surface of solid material. The fires for tomice produce large amounts of fat smoke, but can’t keep the flame. Think of a cigarette is slowly burning, but never actually breaks the flame.
Fire purification and will become a fire fire if appropriate action does not take immediate.
Fires for flaming are the ones we are more familiar with and usually appear from inflammation of any flammable material, like a flammable substance, wood, paper, etc. They generally produce less smoke than more understandable.
In my backyard I built a larger that is a smoke detector and it will feed two different types of smoke through the chimney. I’m a time of response speed. What the alarm for smoke detectors launched, it’s better.
Detection testing in progress.
To simulate the smoke that comes from freezing fire, I sets you 300 g of charcoal and let him warm up 10 minutes before feeding smoke. I wanted to make sure most coal caught fire and that the smoke was thick enough to start alarm.
The recreation of the flame fire was light, only 30 g of chopped paper did the trick. Again, I ensured that there was a significant amount of smoke before eating through the chimney and in the chamber.
To the great discomfort of my neighbors, who had to withstand the smoke tools, and to whom I honestly I have repeated the whole process three times in the smoke dysemor and by the type of smoke, a total of six test races per smoke detector. Finally, I spent the response time on average.
