Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Heat
Google will not have to sell your Chrome Browser to repair the monopoly for searching for searching, federal judge ruled Tuesday, but the technology giant will need to share some of its data with competitors between other legal concessions.
Google General Manager Sandar Pichai. (Photo Jakub Porzici / Nurphoto Via Getty Images)
NurPhoto Via Getty Images
Key facts
JUDGE AMIT P. Mehta is not a party with federal prosecutors who wanted Google to give up from Chrome, saying that the company will not need to sell a popular web browser.
Instead, the judge ruled Google will need to provide search information and customers with “qualified competitors”.
Mehta has banned Google to enter exclusive contracts “relating to Google Assistant and App” Gemini “and said the company will need to offer text-free syndications and searching services.
Google, most of its income from its operations, will also publicly disclose changes, on its ads of advertisements “to promote greater transparency in searching ads of prices”, wrote that “Mehta wrote.
Forbes visited Google to comment.
Get Forsbes Broke News Alerts: We are running a text message alerts, so you will always know the biggest stories that shape the title of the day. Text “Alerts” in (201) 335-0739 or login here.
Tangent
Alphabet actions, Google’s parent company increased on Tuesday, almost 8% on Tuesday after a part of a percentage of $ 211.99.
Large number
63.7%. It is the share of the chromium search engine market held in July, according to Data.
Key background
Less than a year after Google Paid $ 700 million to settle Antitrust’s lawsuit over business practice applications, Mehta ruled in a special case in 2024. year that Google was a monopolistSaying that the company used exclusive distribution agreements and collected “Suprakonompivne prices for general text ads” that led to “anticuting behavior”. A special district judge supported the findings of Mehta, judging in April to Google retained a monopoly Through network advertising technology. The justice department has pushed the sale of chromium to master the verdicts against Google against Google, who said it would hurt the browser and her users. And the firm of confusion has made 34.5 billion dollars offer For the search engine last month, it claims that his offer is “designed to satisfy the antitrust medicine” by placing chromium in the hands of a “capable, independent operator”.
Further reading
Google acted illegally as a search monopoly, referee rules in most (Forbes)
Google held a monopoly via online advertising technology, rules of judges (Forbes)
