The Supreme Court asked to intervene in case of a student bath transfer

The legal struggle about the public school of bathrooms and transgender students are now in the hands of the Supreme Court, where the general South Carolina is Alan Wilson, it will be “the death of the knee” for what he calls “Radical, Hardly Left Agenda”

Southern Carolina asked the Supreme Court to pause an order at the Cathedral’s Prison High School, who clashes with her law who demanded in just a few months after the Court of Ban Tennessee based on gender treatment.

In emergencies in emergencies last week, Wilson, together with state officials, said the governance was leaving the Berkeley District school district “stuck between impossible rock and hard place.”

“I believe this case in the fourth round, at the end, the American Supreme Court will be the death of the knee in that radical, hard-to-left agenda,” said Wilson Fox News Digital in an interview on Tuesday. “This case is not only able to protect the privacy and security of students, but it is about the rights of students themselves to be sure of their schools.”

Belderol in Denver School Bathroom School violated the IX title, Department of Education

The case brings biology-based bathroom rules before the highest court of the nation, only a few months after the Supreme Court of Gender Treatments for Malents – Southern Carolina’s decision says it should lead lower courts.

“It underlines the importance of the ability of states to protect their students and their own units in their states,” Wilson said. “This is one of the questions set up in the decision of the tokrets.”

The fourth round was ruled last month that the student identified in court documents as “John Doe”, the exception was allowed to use the boys to the lawsuit. The decision relies heavily on Grimm v. School Board in Gloucester County, where the court kept that he forbade the transgender boys from the use of the boy’s toilet was violated by the equal protection clause and title IQ.

But South Carolina officials claim that Grimm is outdated “discredited trips” and that the Federal Courts should follow the United States against the Church decision, because “Prosecutor’s Offices are unlikely to overcome,” according to the urgent ban. In the decision, Justices ruled in favor of banning Tennessee on the procedures of transitional transitions for minors.

Scotus Rules on State Prohibition of Gender Transition ‘Treatments’ for minors in Handemark Case

“Like this court and the fourth round, the primary reason for this biology that was rooted to the Convention on the Provision Promotion,” the urgent submission was. “But recent social events tried to change it. During the last fifteen years the number of children and adolescents experienced by gender dysphoria shared abruptly.”

The impugned Law on South Carolina, adopted in July 2024. year, foresee that the school district risks 25% of the State Department of Financing Education if they allow transgender students to use the facilities used in biological sex.

Doe and his parents first sued the state in November 2024. years.

In January, Trump administration is The Education Department has directed the schools and faculties to recognize the title of IX protection strictly based on biological pole – rewrite rules by rules and rewrite the rule. The title IX is a federal law that expands discrimination based on sex in any program or activities that receives government funding. Under Former President Joe Biden’s 2024 The rule, the term “sex” was expanded to cover gender identity and sexual orientation.

CDC official includes “Pregnancy People” Terminology and Deputies in Sets

Click here to get Fox News app

Doe’s lawyer, Aleksandra Zoe Brodski, said Fox News to “South Carolina wants to take an outstanding drug of intervention in the current court appeal – all because the state wants to stop one ninth mirror.”

“This case is not a type of extraordinary situation that would justify such an intervention,” a statement continued. “As the main judge of the fourth round,” there are zero evidence that (our client) use the boys toilets is even remote possibility of nanola is every. But proof of state hostility towards him “. Indeed, neither classmates are challenged to the Supreme Court, including the school discipline, including the school discipline, who rejected him from high school last year.

Supreme court could issue an urgent response already on Friday. The decision of the Court may occur without a complete briefing or oral argument, as typical of judgments from the normal, whole process of the High Court.