Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Per Shiffan and Vester, “Huge Most” respondents said Blueski has a “live and healthy online community”, while Twitter is no longer working. And many Blueki users reported that more bursts for their dollar, in order to speak, on Blueski. They could have a lower number of stacks, but those followers are, for example, someone with 50,000 Twitters / hp followers, for example, can get five likes at a given post; But on Bluesiki, they can only have 5,000 followers, but their posts will get 100 likes.
According to Shiffman, Twitter was always in the top three in terms of recommended traffic for posts on southern fried science. Then there was a “muscation” and suddenly Twitter reference did not even break the top 10. Contrary to this, in 2025. So far, Bluekyskin crossed the “hundred times more views” to southern fried science. Ironically, “the A post on blog It has received the most reviews from Twitter is the one about this paper, “Shiffman said.
Ars Social Media Manager Connor Mcinerney Confirmed That Ars Technica Has Also Seen A Steady Dip in Twitter Referral Traffic Thus Far in 2025. Furthermore, “and Can Say Anecdotally That Over The Summer We’ve seen our Bluesky Traffic Start To Surpass Our Twitter Traffic for the first time, “Mcinerney said, Attribution The Growth to a combination of factors. “We are central to the platform and our audience has increased by 63 percent in my assessment. The platform in September last year, and this month is the latest numbers in the same time period, and this month stressed vs. time.
As for scientists who want to share scientific works online, Shiffman pulled the Altmetrics statistics for his and West his new work. “It’s already one of the 10 most developed works in the history of this social media magazine,” said, 14 shares on Twitter / X compared to a thousand shares on Blueski (from 4. August). “If the goal shows that there is a more active academic scientific conversation about Blueski, I mean, damn,” he said.
And while there was a stable spirit of optia late Inherited media Accusing Blueki to be trapped in his own liberal balloon, Shiffman, for one, has few care about it. “I don’t care about it, because I don’t use social media to argue with strangers about politics” he wrote in its accompanying blog. “I use social media to talk about fish. When I talk about fish on Bluesiki, people ask me about fish, people threaten to kill my family because we are a Jew.” He compared the current incandion of Twitter as not better than 4Chan or TittingSocial in terms of the percentage of “covered extremists” in the audience. “Even if you want to stay, the algorithm works against you,” he wrote.
“There were a lot of opinion about why Blueski is not useful because people are usually leaned there,” Shiffman said Ars. “I haven’t seen any of the same people say Twitter is bad because it is relatively right. Twitter is not a representative public sample.” And given his focus on the oceans about the ocean and scientific-based environmental advocacy, more engagement and convincing audiences in Blueski will be found.