The judge rejects the case of Vioming Sororiti through transgender members for the second time


NewYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

ALAN B. Judge Johnson once again rejected the former case of students of the University of Vioming against their Sorority Enabling Biological Men to join Their group on Friday, ruling that the Sorosity can define the “women” chooses.

Former Kappa Coat Gamma The case of members was rejected for the second time, this time with prejudices, after Johnson found that the University of the Vioming Chapter did not violate any rules, allowing a transgender student artemic Langford.

In his judgmentJohnson wrote that the organization clearly showed the documents to “define women by their gender, not their” biological sex “.

“Nothing in bylaws or constant rules require the words” women “or” women “to include a certain set of reproductive bodies, especially when the dictionary has written more expansive definition”, he wrote an expansive definition “” Johnson wrote nothing.

Hand keeps a small flag over transgender pride.

American District Judge Alan B. Johnson wrote that the variety did not violate their bylaws due to the broader definition of the word “woman”. (East)

Our coarse has enabled the biological males to join. We sue for women’s rights

He also rejected the former quotation of students’ definition “women” under the president Executive order Donald Trump In January as “adults … human females,” adding that he didn’t understand what the description meant.

“We are not fully sure what this definition means, does not have a biology degree,” Johnson wrote. “But even assuming that this definition is harmonized with the prosecutors,” it only applies to the interpretation of the executive branches of federal laws and administration policies. Not relevant in the world of private contracts, which we are currently. “

He added that the court is not allowed to interfere with the organization’s decisions, unless he violated his sub-laws or committed fraud.

“In short, longer to leave Kappa,” Johnson wrote.

Johnson’s dismissal of the case with prejudice means that the same claims can no longer be accomplished with their Court. However, prosecutors can still file a complaint.

KKG Members Sororiti

ALAN B. Judge Johnson rejected the former Kappa Kappa Gamma members of members without prejudice, which means they could not re-bring the same claims in his court. (Fox News / Ingraham Angle)

Fox News Digital He reached for the Kappa Kappa Gamma for a comment.

The spokesman at the University of Vioming said Fox News Digital is that “does not play in determining membership in Sororitivity” and was not involved in the lawsuit.

The Appeals Court hears a lawsuit for students in the Vioming University against Sorority for Trans-Permission

Johnson declined the case before Without prejudice in 2023. years after the judgment that the Chapter of the University of Vioming did not violate their bylaws, because they did not clearly define the word “woman”.

“The University of Vioming voted to admit – and, wider, wider, with his investigation, who today will not define the” wife “of non-profit, otherwise not intruded in non-profit courts. Expressed associations and injection The described defense prosecutors suggests, “the judge said.

Kappa Kappa Gama Vioming

The Kappa Kappa Gamma Sisters at the University of Vioming challenged the admission of Artemis Langford in court. (Facebook / Kappa Kappa Gamma University of Vioming)

Click here to get Fox News app

Former students lined up in their original complaint that Langford not only did not just invest himself to look like a woman after joining Sorosity, but would also “Voieuristic” Watch women in intimate situations. The complaint described one scenario in which Langford “had a visible erection” as he looked at the members of the Sorority.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *