With 75,000+ employees in the target, is it news that a few dissatisfied?


While it is long New York Times Editor Max Frankel “Despised the Russians and Sided Passionately with their Victims,” ​​He Wonded in His 1999 Memoirs Why Us-Based Red Batters Were So Eager To Credit “The Testimony of Former Communists Who Now Gained Fame and Fortune By Confessing That They Had Trafficked In American Secrets and Soviet Lies. ” Why really.

Frankel’s orthogonal view of the loudest critics of communism emphasizes for another Washington Post effort To display the target indifferent to the safety of children who use their social media. The Mails The latest research report is inspired by “by poisoning documents from the target recently discovered Congress Two currents and two former employees who claim that the target is suppressed by the research that could illuminate potential security risks to children and teenagers on the company’s virtual applications. “

The report tone asks the question parallel to the one who asked Frankel in the 1950s: If the target was so abused, why is Mail So eager to deserve testimony of two currents and two former targets of employees? Given this still in Meta’s employees, if we ignore the possibility of being softening the eventual post-meta landing, less ignore the nature of their actions, while they still receive salaries from the same corporation, they try to be meaningless.

From there it is worth pointing out that while Mail He captures his allegations (rejected by targets) about disclosing four people, the target can currently seek approximately 75, 945 employees. You are considering the previous number, at the same time given the revelation of two existing and two former employees. That there will be four, and probably many employees dissatisfied with how the company operates is not insight. In basketball and football it is almost impossible for the best coaches to keep 15 and 53 players happy and dedicated to a higher cause, but investigators on Mail Expect Metain C-Suite retained 75,000+ employees?

In addition, it is difficult to deserve Mail with any truly material discoveries. Once again, it suggested that the target “suppresses the potentially risks of children and teen”, except for an unpleasant truth that the target has long been on the way to limited the child and teenage access to their various bids in the same way. This target makes such an effort is proof of a corporation in denial, but instead of recognizing the risks involved in younger users and they spend huge resources to help parents mitigate these same risks.

At one point that the meters were aware that young people needed, but to imply the targets, drinking and driving what they should not see, drink that they should not see, drink and caracically occasionally For young people. Of course, young people will break several rules, but it is difficult for something that the target can or should be expected to control Menlo Park.

It still brings Frankel to mind, and its further mystification that “oath of loyalty” was extracted from federal employees, would cause spies in government to belong their nepheris activities. At that time, it was not a serious point of view, and investigative journalists were not serious about expecting all the users of the product package to adhere to any and all rules of use. All targets can help parents protect their children, which is what is already doing.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *