Confusion to sue from Japanese media giants for theft information and representing false information

Another day, another instance and the company allegedly deals with the copyright violation. Two Japanese media groups, Nikkei and the Asahi shimbunsued for confusion for illegally “copied and preserved content of articles” from server para, The Financial times reports. Nikkei possesses Financial times.

The two media groups claim confusion and incorrect information and attribute these untruths to companies. “If it remained unveiled, this situation could undermine the foundation of journalism, which is dedicated to precise accurately transmission of facts” Nikkei and the Asahi shimbunthat submitted a joint lawsuit, stated.

Each company requires 2.2 billion yen ($ 15 million) to save for confusion to remove preserved articles. “Actions of confusion amount to a large scale about the content of the article that the journalists of both companies spend their investigation, while confusion pays no compensation, while confusion pays no compensation Nikkei said in a statement.

It is ironic that this news comes only one day after the confusion announced New income sharing plan For publishers. The new comet plus subscription is used that provides users with a “premium content of a group of trusted publishers and journalists” for $ 5 per month.

Publishers are ready to receive 80 percent of income, initially receive a payment from a swimming pool of $ 42.5 million. However, this means that the subscription provides $ 4 to convert the entire library, a significant reduction of 20 to $ 30 million many newspapers now accuse them of access.

Perplexity Current publisher’s program Provides ads of advertisement income that the publisher could receive if users are clicking on their articles, not to read a summary of confusion.

These moves create the appearance of confusion that tries to act above the board, but the latest lawsuit is not the first time they first appeared in the site without permission. It’s not the first time this month.

August start CloudFar report found confusion allegedly Arranged web sticks to sneak around the robot.txt files and firewalls. Cloudfare claims to be confusing to falsely represent a Google Chrome with a generic browser and rotating through IP addresses that are not related to the company.

Confusion also faced with a Charging series In the summer of 2024. years. Forbes He accused the company for illegal withdrawal of stories and publishing them, while Wired It reports that confusion is the costumes of content from it and other publications owned by the Association.