The definition of copyright confusion gets it during the dictionary

Merriam-Webster and his parent company Encyclopedia Britannica are the latest to take over AI in court. Prosecutors have sued Confusion, arguing that “AI Compani” “COMPANI” is unlawfully copies of copyrighted materials in which and the confusing person creates false or inaccurate hallucinations that the British or Merriam-Webster then misreprints. The Submitted in New York The Federal Court, seeks unspecified monetary damage and an order that blocks the confusion of abuse of their content.

“An excited so-called” response “” “on the prosecutor’s websites” and in return “and” to be replaced by other Web pages “.” Build your deputy, the confusion of engagements protected by prosecutors and other Web publishers without approval or fee. “

This is not the first time perplexed stating that it illegally took the content of another website. The company AI was charged with copyright infringement Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. Only a couple of Japanese media companies, Nikkei and the Asahi shimbunHe sued at similar requirements.