House Democrats are deducted on FBI handling Jeffrey Epstein case

Democrats of Sudekir Coses Democrats announced that the FBI probe whether Caša Patel intentionally refuses to detect information in this regard Jeffrey Epstein.

“Who exactly protects you to release Epstein files? 2023. The Federal Protection Bureau (FBI) was” protected by the most important predict. Due to who the list, “simply. Because of who is on that list, “Democratic. That’s why it’s on that list,”) democratic. Because of who is on that list, “Democratic. That’s why it’s on that list,” Simple. Because of who is on that list “” Democratic Prophet. Because of who are on that list of democratic legislators. D-MD., He wrote.

“Now that you are the FBI director, you know exactly which is involved in Epstein files, and yet you refuse to fire them. Who are you protecting and why?”

The house moves to exhibit Epstein files, authorizes a supervisory probe

The letter indicated several occasions in Epstein’s case, including his statement, including a role, “there will be no disappearance, and no one from the previous or current bureau that will be quickly haunting.”

“Strange, making all these promises crashed after you specify who is actually in the files,” Democrats wrote.

They also stated New York Times Report that there are detailed hundreds of people that flow across thousands of documents related to Epstein.

“This Frantic Review by almost 1,000 agents over 100,000 pages of investigating the American public, however, at least some information from the audit are divided by President Bondi allegedly informed Trump repeatedly in Epstein.

“Obvious issues abound: Why did they have any release of documents that have been given to these agents who have been reported to their promise and how these decisions were related to the President and how these decisions are related to review files And how are these decisions related to the president? “

President Donald Trump Sam denied that he was told that his name was in any files related to Epstein at the end of July.

“No, I’ve never been, I’m never familiar. No,” said the president at the time.

It was never reported in which contextual Trump name may appear, however. The two were known that the two were friendly before relegation in the early 2000, though Trump was never involved in any injustice regarding Epstein’s crimes.

Longtime Biden Aide says he stood to earn up to $ 8 million that the president won re-elections

Trump himself directed the Department of Justice (Doy) To free the transcript of the Grand Jury In connection with Epstein and lawyer lawyer Pam Bondi, he had his deputy interview Epstein Samplce Ghislaine Makvell on Florida Prison.

Trump also called a foror’s “scam” epistein environment.

Lower has since turned over thousands of documents relating to Epstein to monitor the house supervision.

The convicted in the Sex Office Epstein committed suicide 2019. years, while waiting for the federal trafficking in human trafficking and the GOP base is fractified over case management.

Click here to get Fox News app

The divisions arise from the lower memory published in July, which said: “This systematic examination did not detect the incriminating ‘client list.’ There was also no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed the prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not reveal evidence that could predict an investigation against the untouched third parties. “

Since the Democrats, have since seized a disagreement with new contributions for transparency in Epstein’s case, which Republicans pulled as hypocrisy.

The Public Information Officer for Public Information of the FBI refused to comment on the letter when the bureau reached the digital digital fox.