Scotus refuses to cross the transgender bathroom in southern carolina

The Supreme court On Wednesday, he refused to take the application from South Carolina, which would like to carry out his ban on students using public schools of bathrooms that suit their gender identity.

A brief order is a small obstacle to the state in its offer to tighten policies related to transgender people, but the lawsuit on the issue will continue to continue at lower courts. Three independent Justice, Thomas Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Goruch, would give a request of southern carolina.

The High Court’s order comes after a Federal Appeals Court He temporarily joined the state to carry out his law as the case was go. The state wanted the Supreme Court to temporarily raise that ban.

Supreme Court for Consideration of State Ban on Participation of Transgender Athletes in School Sports

The transgender lawyer participates in the rally in front of the US Supreme Court. (Getty Images)

The American Court of Appeals for the fourth round awarded a ban on the request of the Ninth Grader who wanted to use the Bath Bath, which did not suit the sex of the student.

Lawyers for students, identified as John Doe in the lawsuit, claimed a High Court that the urgent break in the fourth round was not guaranteed given a lawsuit focused on only one student. No other student brought a problem with John Doe using a boys toilet, lawyers noticed.

“Actually, no student was ever complained about sharing the boys to John, who put on and presented as a boy, because he was a young child,” the lawyers were written.

Scotus Rules on State Prohibition of Gender Transition ‘Treatments’ for minors in Handemark Case

The new proposal of the Management Board of the Florida Florida University would force the University Faculty to adhere to the state law to use the school bath in accordance with their biological sex. (Jeffrey Greenberg / Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

The decision of the Supreme Court to fall the petition of southern Caroline comes after supporting a ban on tennessee on certain transgender medical treatments for juveniles. (Allison Dinner / AFP via Getty Images)

The command of the Supreme Court was incomplete and gave little insight in the way the Court will continue to approach the disputed cultural issue. It comes as the High Court supported a ban in June in June in June at certain ministeries for minors and while judges are preparing to hear the years of this impending time of transforming partial participation in school sports.

Click here to get Fox News app

Southern carolina Lawyers referenced the complaint, which is ready to be carefully viewed, this term, in search of judges to allow its prohibition to enter into force.

“This case implies a question full of emotions and different perspectives,” the lawyers wrote. “It’s more and more reason to delay state lawmakers waiting. The decision was the legislature of South Carolina.”