Star says no one can be copyright to viral

GLorilla wants to finish the lawsuit, claiming that she stole a “natural, without BBL” from viral devographes, saying the judge that no man can copyright short-term and “cliché” term “cliché.

Case, Submitted this summerHe claims that Instagram The User named Natalie Henderson renovated the phrase – Brazilian asses “surgery – and that Glorilla later stole that he later stole it for use in his 2024 songs” never finds “without permission.

But on Monday, the movement asks for a judge to reject the whole case, the Railer’s lawyers say that there is one big deal of the Copyright not covering the “usual” series of words.

“Phrase” natural (e), without BBL ‘-Reference to a person with a physical body that is not “Brazilian butt” cosmetic procedure – is too common, everyday, sluggish, and clenched to protect copyrighted laws ” Bilbord.

Glorila lawyers listen to seven other songs, which in the last two years presented similar terms, including the reper Real Boston Richei: “The term in question in the prosecutor is not original and thus not original and thus.

Even if Henderson’s alleged parabilic premiere, Glorra’s lawyers say her song did not copy. They say there is no evidence that she ever heard Henderson’s phrase and that she used distinctly different in “everyone who listens to two songs would be easily reached that these songs did not matter.”

“They never find,” in carbon, was presented at Glorill’s debit Studio album, who reached the peak on board on board 200 and ended up as the best-selling female rap album last year. The song alone, the bonus track, not literal.

Henderson (@raladabodilast on Instagram) filed a lawsuit in June, stating not only her viral phrase already and the song she wrote, who wrote the lyric “all natural, without BBL / BBL, do not give in hell.” Glorilla’s Liric reads: “Natural, not BBL / But I’m still to give him hell.”

“There are unmistakable similarities between two parts,” the Henderson’s lawyer wrote at the time.

But as Bilbord At that time, such claims were always faced with a battle in court. The Copyright Law does not cover short phrases, including slogans and talens, nor does the usual material that have been widely used. It’s just an argument that Glorilla lawyers made Monday.

Through her short career, the star has already faced several cases of copyright – some rite of passage for any growing artist.

In 2023. year was affected by a lawsuit who claims that she used unlicensed samples in its hit songs “Tomorrow” and “tomorrow 2”; The case was rejected last year. Last year, we sued next to Megan Themes Stallion, Cardi B and others over the claims that the song was 2024. “You want to be a” highlighted specimen of braids “2008.” Me and my Goon. “That case had fallen voluntarily this year.