Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Your review review expires Take
NewYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Supreme court Justice Ami Coney Barrett was pushed back against the Partizan portraits of the Supreme Court, speaking Fox News’ Brett Bayer that the righteouss “carry black, not red or blue” and not the next constitution, not politics.
Appeared on a fox to promote their new book, Listening to the Lawand to deal with public perceptions on the work and independence of the court.
Barrett emphasized that the court was not divided into partisan teams. She also defended her approach to presidential power, clarified misconceptions about Dobbs The decision and reflected in its original judicial philosophy.
Its book touches details such as a tradition of sitting, in courtroom and a gap between external perception and internal reality.
The American Supreme Court of Justice Ami Conei Barrett is seen during the ceremonial curse on the South Lawn of the White House after its confirmation to the Supreme Court in October 2020. years. (Photo Alex Alex Vong / Getty Images) (Getty Images)
“You know, we don’t wear red and blue, we all wear black, because judges are not parartizan. And the idea is that we are trying to correct the right.” We are not seated on certain sides of the bench, left and fine. You know, we sit in the order of the internship. “
Barrett emphasized the interruption between the public’s perception and the internal part of the court, noting:
“I often look for a new law What was most surprised when you started? And one of the most common answers is the difference between what is happening in the interior and what people are considered inland.”
President Donald Trump and Ami Conei Barrett, the US Supreme Court, stand on the balcony during the Ceremony in the South Lawn White House in Washington, DC, on Monday, 26. October 2020 (Ken Cedeno / CNP / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Critics on the left claim Court Protect the former President Donald Trump, a view that reflects in the headings from points of sale such as The New York Times and NBC.
Barrett replied by placing the work of the Court in the historical context, emphasizing that cases in the presidential government extend beyond any tenant of the office.
“We do not only decide cases for today, and we do not decide to decide on the basis of the president,” Barrett said. “As a current occupant occupant, we decide cases of presidency. So we run each case and look at the question of presidential power as it comes. And the cases that we decide today.
Justice Barrett defends Jackson Jabs as “justifiable” in a rare public appearance
Judges about the US Supreme Court represent their official photo of the Supreme Court in Washington, DC 7. October 2022. Years (Olivier Dolieri / AFP via Getty Images)
“Four presidents from now, six presidents from now, and so on. Each of these cases we get, you know, I mean, I mean, some of them overlap, but many are different other constitutional The questions, “she added.
She emphasized the court rules on the presidency as an institution, with decisions that resonate through the administration.
Turning in Dobbs decisionBarrett said that the verdict was not a ban on abortion, but this question returned to the political process – a point claimed widely misunderstood.
“Dobbs did not say that abortion was illegal. Dobbs said it belonged to the political process,” Barrett said.
Barrett has recognized increasing threats to judges, emphasizing violence should not be “public service costs”.
Click here to get Fox News app
Return to public perception, she said that the court must follow the law even when they judgments are unpopular, emphasizing integrity due to public opinion.
“The court cannot take into account public opinion in making individual decisions … you need to follow the law where it leads, even if most people do not want to go,” she said.
