Lacks case against Google, the courts have preserved antitrust from themselves


What disaster if the courts forced to sell chrome … for antitrust.

Evidence supported by the above request can be found throughout us and in countless ways in which we can access endless amounts of information on the Internet. But to keep the stuff, everything needs to be Bing, Duckduckgo, Greek, co-pilot, confusion, Chatgpt or – Yes – Google The word “anthropic”.

While the definition of a vocabulary anthropy “involving or about the existence of human life, especially as constraint At the theories of the universe, “searching anthropic starting from capital A leads us to another business rate to detect artificial intelligence (AI) the future that you read it is almost at the earliest of the early stages.

Anthropions “Claude” is described as “conversational ai designed to be useful, honest and harmless.” Imagine that as even more competition for our time in the present and the future, futurity Operational descriptor in considering anthropic private values ​​of $ 185 billion. Anthropic opened his doors only four years ago.

What is the point, and also the answer to the former Assistant Jonathan Kanter’s attorney regret in New York Times that “Washington had a wide open shot that Google is responsible for purifying the violation of antitrusts. Instead of engaging in court They banked the puck from the boardshoping for a happy bouncing. “In a quieter moment, Kanter could recognize that unlike the banking” Pack excluded from Das “, saved an antitrust law.

To see why, re-think about private assessment of anthropy again. Far from the mirrors in the present store, 185 billion dollars are quite outsize, others, and certainly countless others will eventually invent a business environment that would not have reminded that in what way it does not look like it. The statement of obvious? Well, yes. But sometimes it is obviously to be stated.

While Google or Alphabet’s Corporate Assessment is currently dwarfing anthropic, anthropic market capitalization that tomorrow on the internet will bring new meaning to George tomorrow, it is about that tomorrow in relation to that future second century. It is worth keeping in mind while Kanter and other Google critics interfere with chrome.

Untitling None of its Overdryness born in the face of some most powerful competitions (not to forget Microsoft Internet Explorer), evolving the fruition of chromation that alternately reveals that the time is excellent that it is someone based on how the time is indicated. As this column routinely declared, chromira search of 2025. years requested by request from 2022. years, and they do not do this due to non-chrome-chrome-chrome-chrome options. Unlike the monopolists with chromium, Google adopted him the future that in no way reminds it of the present. And it doesn’t change.

Once again see Antropic. The value of 185 billion dollars is not a path signal that persecutes technological space, but strong dynamism throughout us. What may explain the Google’s investment in anthropic, and a very realistic possibility that relative technology Minnos has to read what is forward from today’s giants.

It is a long way to say that Google has long known what antitrust critics. Translated, “monopoly” The strategy that chromir informed the way to the rapid basis. The “Washington” is possible to search the previous truth last week, and that once again saved antitrust’s self.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *