It will be distracted to share revenue from AI search with publishers


Artificial intelligence systems need content to produce results and criticized that they did not pay people who wrote and arranged that content. Now, Confusion AIAI’s search engine is a comet plus cashing. This new subscriber overpayment will distribute revenues for publication of partners whenever readers use AI to collect or provide journalistic content, The company said in the blog in the post Monday.

In AI Age, high-quality information is crucial, and confusion claims that publishers should be compensated for bringing and users who content. According to Bloomberg, the company assigned $ 42.5 million for a partner program and is currently looking for publishing partners. Tier costs users a $ 5 per month, but will be included free with those with a jealing procurement subscription Pro or Max.

You have atlas

“Simply put, and gives much more to users, who do not like unwanted click and never have,” Jesse Dvier, Head of Communications are confusing. “A real business model for AI AGE should ensure that publishers and journalists benefit from Internet improvement.”

Alertness says that it will compensate for publishers in three ways: through human visits, the requested citations and agent actions.

The first is obvious: Whenever someone uses a network confusion, by clicking on the publishing partner, the net will be compensated for fees. Another way is when convulsion cites part of the content in its AI abstract, which will also activate the share of income. And finally, whenever and confusion, visit the publisher’s website to do some task on behalf of the beneficiaries, which will be net compensation.

Comet plus

Comet Plus is a new confusion program that shares revenues with publishers.

Perplexity

Comet It is also the name of the new AI-Web browser of confusion AI, which is currently being tested among selected user groups. The comet uses AI to summarize the websites you are viewing and you can perform tasks on your behalf.

Rise Ai ChatbotsPublishers became More and more tranned about the use of their content. Since the AI ​​models are trained on network content, including material research, written, regulated and financed by publications such as New York Times, Wall Street Street Journal and others, publishers consider them to be reimbursed. Multiple lawsuits against AI companies were submitted, including Perplexity and chatgpt maker Openai.

(Discovered by: Ziff Davis, Cneta Registry Company, in April, filed a lawsuit against Openai, stating that Ziff Davis Copyright in training and managed his AI and systems.)

AI Models need access to high quality information for improvement and continuation that one-stop information is in the store. The publications are Now licensing contracts with AI companies to sell this content. The confusion movement expands to include crawling data for AI training and cases of use of the Agency.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *