Lessons in power of a different / UMG

UMG’s procurement of several stickers creates competition for internal resources, potentially artists as involved collateral damage.

Getty

The rivalry of Kendrick Lamara and Drake can initially be surprised, given that the two rappers are presented with the same label: Universal Music Group (“UMG”). More surprisingly, it can be Drake who sues his label while still under the contract.

However, viewed on the background of significant displacements in the musical industry, from streaming gaps of income to developing bids for representations, this feud feels less like outlier and more as a result of long-term tensions. The friction reflects deeper, systemic challenges that stretched the relationships of artists’ labels across the board.

Consolidation of stickers and representation of artists

The combinations of stickers like these become increasingly more often, because the main players are trying to consolidate market share. The UMG has acquired the Label Label Label Lamar in 1999., and then, after that, he distributed via Interscope. In 2000. years, UMG has gained republican records, which Drake was signed to young money and money in cash. Through these efforts, the UMG has taken on the market dominant, and the interest of ownership for more than half of the billboards of hot 100 tracks for 2023. Year.

In his Legal submissionDrake states the parallels between the close expiration of the defivative track against him, stating: “… The UMG expected that the extension of Drake’s contract will be expensive. The UMGG will receive a new agreement to sign a new role.” His legal team further speculated that the alleged UMG practices were encouraged by pressure to fulfill their short-term deal with Lamara. Submission claims: “On information and belief, Lamar saw whether the UMG could prove it, Lamar, Lamar, Lamar will continue his relationship with UMG” Lamar will continue his relationship with success, Lamar will make it your relationship with a new, long-term contract. “

According to the legal submission, the UMG is allegedly under pressure to prove its value at the 22-time winner by Gramma Kendrick Lamar, which stretched the label to unfairly promote Lamarske tracks over Drake.

CBS via Getty Images

The internal dynamics between interscope and republican records within the UMG system shows how the designation of the label affects the artist’s representation. When several stickers under the same corporate umbrella compete for internal resources and playback placement, artists can become collateral damage in the struggle. Even successful works can find them to navigate on bureaucratic narrow to maintain visibility and support.

The question of Drake and Kendrick Lamar is not isolated. Other high disputes also pointed out how artists can lose control of promotion, ownership or even public narration around their work. Even for artists with powerful teams, job expressions can be tilted in favor of stickers. A Citi GPS report Since 2018. It has revealed that artists have captured only 12% of the total revenue of the music industry – a figure that even seven years later remains a sharp measure of how much valuation flows to people who make music.

These moments underline how vulnerable artists can be in the complex M & A environment industry. Even the most prominent names are not immune to lose control of their masters or swing (even unintentionally) as it moves corporate priorities.

Vulnerability of artist art

This dynamic is even Starker for shortly and independent artists. Without the influence of celebrity like drake, newer artists are often forced to choose between keeping control or have a real chance on visibility.

Like Drake’s team assert: “UMG uses this size and dominance to convince artists to sign their recording labels. Because of the streaming, it is more than before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before before passing the audience before “

In other words, the pure volume is now working against the discovery. UMG’s dominant market share, combined with the daily flood of new content on the DSP, means that artists who are not connected to the main label systems are suddenly visible challenges.

Adding that pressure, Goldman Sachs It assessed that superfeny (top 20% of the listener) can amount to 70% of income transfer for some artists. Such a type of concentration of engagements raises roles for playlists, algorithmic momentum and attention to a large extent, which are increasingly difficult to access the outside.

And despite the growth of DII platforms, the main labels are not faded. The UMG and its peers continue to control over 75% of the global recorded music market (although the exact market share varies from the region, three majosters continue to dominate globally). This domination makes it difficult to act independently in the field for playing levels, even with distribution tools and social reach.

This imbalance does not only apply to streaming. It extends to tour, marketing, synchronization licensing and almost any other opportunity downstream. When these pipelines are structured with major in mind, giving up load becomes a far risk bet.

Construction of better protection

Live connection Nations-Ticketmaster is facing federal investigations in market monopolization, asking questions whether the label of the sticker could be ordered.

Getti images

For independent artists, navigation of these challenges takes more than a creative vision. Readiness is needed to get involved with strong contracts, legal clarity and willingness to withdraw back. Knowing its rights, protects your IP and negotiating the conditions of distribution and ownership overcomes it critical. Labels can provide powerful reinforcement, but it often comes at the price of long-term levers.

Before you sign anything, artists should consider whether it is compromised worth it and whether there are more protective trails to exchange their career.

And with the Ministry of Justice investigating Live Nation-Ticketmaster Connecting, the tide can one day turn against unverified industry consolidation. If a similar monitoring guests the recording sector, large stickers could soon face pressure not only from their talent, but also from federal regulators.

Legal entertainment has achieved a representation for comment and will update this story as needed.